(function($,window){ jQuery(document).ready(function ($) { //timer const juneTimer = () => { // Set the target date to June 1 const targetDate = new Date('June 1, 2023 00:00:00').getTime(); // Update the countdown every second const countdown = setInterval(() => { // Get the current date and time const currentDate = new Date().getTime(); // Calculate the remaining time in milliseconds const remainingTime = targetDate - currentDate; // Check if the countdown is finished if (remainingTime <= 0) { clearInterval(countdown); console.log("Countdown finished!"); return; } // Calculate the remaining days, hours, minutes, and seconds const days = Math.floor(remainingTime / (1000 * 60 * 60 * 24)); const hours = Math.floor( (remainingTime % (1000 * 60 * 60 * 24)) / (1000 * 60 * 60) ); const minutes = Math.floor((remainingTime % (1000 * 60 * 60)) / (1000 * 60)); const seconds = Math.floor((remainingTime % (1000 * 60)) / 1000); // Display the countdown const countString = `${days} days, ${hours} hours, ${minutes} minutes, ${seconds} seconds`; $('#june-timer').text(countString); }, 1000); } juneTimer(); }); // document ready }(jQuery,window));

Kline v. Zimmer, Inc. – Impact on the Legal Landscape of Expert Testimony

Kline v. Zimmer, Inc. – Impact on the Legal Landscape of Expert Testimony

Summary

The May 2022 California Court of Appeal case, Kline v. Zimmer, Inc., stands for the general proposition that a defendant may have an expert testify as to possible alternative causes of an injury to rebut a plaintiff’s expert, even if those alternative possible causes do not rise to a reasonable degree of medical certainty. Using examples from their recent trial, Martinez v. Harman Fitness, PSR...

Sign Up to View More!

JOIN PSR PLAYBOOK Learn from the best as part of our exclusive Plaintiff Lawyer network. Membership is free to access our digital library and live events.